This Article argues that the Palsgraf perspective is mistaken and proposes a different moral picture of tort law’s normative substance and doctrinal structure. Tort law may be centrally concerned with “common morality,” rather than promoting the welfare of society at large.26 But torts are not relational legal wrongs, and their purpose is not to recognize or redress relational moral wrongs. Torts are remedial pigeonholes: legal liability rules that identify the complex conditions under which a defendant is morally liable to provide a plaintiff with compensation or other forms of remedial relief. Rather than recognizing a species of relational moral wrongdoing or interpersonal mistreatment, a tort such as negligence is a coarse doctrinal device that identifies instances of “moral wrongdoing for which the offender must pay,”27 whether or not he has treated the plaintiff wrongfully. Other torts identify forms of behavior that render a defendant liable to pay compensation for resulting injuries although he has not behaved wrongfully at all. In both negligence and the other torts, a defendant may be liable to compensate a plaintiff even if he has not wronged or mistreated her. Contra the Palsgraf perspective, relational moral wrongdoing is not the basis of remedial liability, either in ordinary morality or the law of torts.
Усиление атак Ирана в Ормузском проливе повысило угрозу его закрытия08:38，更多细节参见whatsapp
On average, each statement has 6.4 dependencies with a total of 24.8 LoC (61 dependencies with a total of 382 LoC at maximum).。关于这个话题，谷歌提供了深入分析
AI is quietly poisoning itself and pushing models toward collapse - but there's a cure
（一）拒不执行人民政府在紧急状态情况下依法发布的决定、命令的；